Dokumentumok

Nyomtatóbarát változat

Cím:	Social Capital Survey - Background List Bulgaria
Szerző:
Ország:
A kiadás helye:
A kiadás éve:	2004
Kiadó:
Terjedelem:
Nyelv:	angol
Tárgyszavak:	social capital, társadalmi tőke
Állomány:	Community Development Network Building in Central and Eastern Europe, Közösségfejlesztési hálózatépítés Kelet-Közép Európában, Társadalmi tőke
Forditas:
Megjegyzés:
Annotáció:
Leltár:
Raktári jelzet:	E

A Check-list for Background Variables for an exploratory analysis of community level social capital data from Central and East European Countries

Project on Community Development Partnership Building in Central and Eastern Europe

Preliminary notes

This list serves as a guideline for checking background variables for the community level social capital surveys carried out under the given Networking Project.

The list is tentative and its application is voluntary for those involved in the Project. If done, however, it may well enhance the value of the data pooled from local surveys with very diverse backgrounds. Feed-back on the list may help in making a more controlled interpretation of the findings we have to date, and may contribute to better coordinated methodologies for future research.

For those who are ready to respond, the time-line for sending the completed list is 21 May.


Background variables

Where was the survey done?
Names of community, region, country: Biala Slatina, Bulgaria
Community characteristics
§ Population size – number of inhabitants: 15 534
§ Population profile
o Gender: 48 % female
o Age-structure
· under 14 14%
· 14-18 7%
· 19-62 55%
· 62 and over 24%
o Ethnic composition Bulgarian 67.4%
Roma 31%
Turkish 1%
Wallachian 0,6%
o Religious composition: Christians 30%
Muslims 70%

§ Rural/urban community profile
· (predominantly) rural
· (predominantly) urban
· can’t decide
§ Economic profile
· Occupational structure
o Agrarian .…………………………….. 30 %
o Other primary sector (e.g. mining) .....…………. %
o Secondary (industrial) sector …………….. 40 %
o Tertiary (service) sector ..………………….. 4,7 %
· Unemployment rate: .………….………………….. 25,3 %
· Commuters rate: .………….………………….. %
(% of those who are having their jobs in an other community, in of total work force)
§ Public security
please rate the public security in the community
on a 5 point scale
(1 “very bad” … 5 “very good”, as compared to national average, by your personal opinion)
1 2 3 4 5
§ Could you cite any data on deviant behavior?
(alcoholism, drog-abuse, suicide, crime, etc.)

small number alcoholism
When was the survey done?
Starting date: day: 9 month : February year: 2004
Closing date: day: 20 month : February year: 2004

Type of research
Participative research
(part of community development)
Non-participative research
(implemented for external purposes without significant participation)

Coverage of sampling
Covering all the community (total coverage)
Covering part of the community: 0.65 % covered

Unit of sampling
Individual
Household or family
Other

Methods of sampling (if coverage is not total)
Simple random sample
Stratified random sample
Other method: see Summary

Representative sample?
Representative
Not representative
Not discernable

Size and composition of sample
Number of all those selected into the sample: 103
Number of those contacted: N/A
Number of non-respondents: N/A
(who declined responding to the questionnaire as a whole)
Number of processable questionnaires: N/A
(questionnaires with any number of valid response)

How were the questionnaires administered?
§ self-administered
· in presence of interviewer
· in absence of interviewer
o with prior explanation on administering
o without prior explanation on administering
(questionnaires were just delivered to respondents
and collected after self-administration)
§ administered by interviewer
· interviewer from local community
· interviewer from outside
§ by other method: …………………………………………….….

Frame of reference of calculating response distributions

“100%” distributions of calculated data on particular questions
as a rule INclude “no answer/no data”

“100%” distributions of calculated data
as a rule EXclude “no answer/no data”
(“100%” as a rule was calculated including only “valid responses”)

Respondent’s background data
Please check which of the following were surveyed:

Age
Gender
Education
Marriage status (single, married, divorced, etc.)
Family/household size
Family/household status
Occupation
Employment status (employed/unemployed)
Income
Ethnic group
Religion



Date: 19 November 2004

Dokumentumok