Közösségfejlesztés
Dokumentumok
Cím:
Romanian Background List
Nyelv:
angol
Tárgyszavak:
network, community development, Central and Eastern Europe, Measuring Social Capital, Romanian
Állomány:
Community Development Network Building in Central and Eastern Europe, Közösségfejlesztési hálózatépítés Kelet-Közép Európában
Forditas:
Megjegyzés:
Raktári jelzet:
E
A Check-list for Background Variables
for an exploratory analysis of
community level social capital data
from Central and East European Countries
Project on Community Development Partnership Building
in Central and Eastern Europe
Preliminary notes
This list serves as a guideline for checking background variables for the community level social capital surveys carried out under the given Networking Project.
The list is tentative and its application is voluntary for those involved in the Project. If done, however, it may well enhance the value of the data pooled from local surveys with very diverse backgrounds. Feed-back on the list may help in making a more controlled interpretation of the findings we have to date, and may contribute to better coordinated methodologies for future research.
For those who are ready to respond, the time-line for sending the completed list is 21 May.
Background variables
Where was the survey done?
Names of community, region, country:
Aliceni Village, Comuna Posta Calnau, Buzau County, Romania
Community characteristics
§
Population size – number of inhabitants: 490
§
Population profile
o
Gender: 63% female
o
Age-structure
·
under 14 %
·
15-25 %
·
26-40 %
·
41-60 %
·
61 and over %
Info not available
o
Ethnic composition Romanian 95 %
Rroma 5 %
……………… %
if % not available, predominant ethnic groups (in order of predominance): …………………………………………….
o
Religious composition Ortodox: 100 %
……………………………… %
………………………………. %
if % not available, predominant ethnic groups (in order of predominance): …………………………………………….
§
Rural/urban community profile
·
rural
·
(predominantly) urban
·
can’t decide
§
Economic profile
·
Occupational structure
o
Agrarian 80 %
o
Other primary sector (e.g. mining) …………. %
o
Secondary (industrial) sector 5 %
o
Tertiary (service) sector 5 %
·
Unemployment rate: …………………………….. %
·
Commuters rate: 5 %
(% of those who are having their jobs in an other community, in of total work force)
§
Public security
please rate the public security in the community
on a 5 point scale
(1 “very bad” … 5 “very good”, as compared to national average, by your personal opinion)
1 2 3 4
5
§
Could you cite any data on deviant behavior?
(alcoholism, drog-abuse, suicide, crime, etc.)
……………………………………………………………………
When was the survey done?
Starting date: day: ….…. month : …………….……. year: ……..…..
Closing date: day: ….…. month : …………….……. year: ……..…..
Type of research
Participative research
(part of community development)
Non-participative research
(implemented for external purposes without significant participation)
Coverage of sampling
Covering all the community (total coverage)
Covering part of the community
: …………………… 18 % covered
Unit of sampling
Individual
Household or family
Other
Methods of sampling (if coverage is not total)
Simple random sample
Stratified random sample
Other method: ………………………………………………………………...
Representative sample?
Representative
Not representative
Not discernable
Size and composition of sample
Number of all those selected into the sample: 100
Number of those contacted: 87
Number of non-respondents: 13
(who declined responding to the questionnaire as a whole)
Number of processable questionnaires: 87
(questionnaires with any number of valid response)
How were the questionnaires administered?
§
self-administered
·
in presence of interviewer
·
in absence of interviewer
o
with prior explanation on administering
o
without prior explanation on administering
(questionnaires were just delivered to respondents
and collected after self-administration)
§
administered by interviewer
·
interviewer from local community
·
interviewer from outside
§
by other method: …………………………………………….….
Frame of reference of calculating response distributions
“100%” distributions of calculated data on particular questions
as a rule INclude “no answer/no data”
“100%” distributions of calculated data
as a rule EXclude “no answer/no data”
(“100%” as a rule was calculated including only “valid responses”)
Respondent’s background data
Please check which of the following were surveyed:
Age:
Age
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
17-24
8
9,2
9,2
9,2
24-34
11
12,6
12,6
21,8
35-44
14
16,1
16,1
37,9
45-54
5
5,7
5,7
43,7
55-64
15
17,2
17,2
60,9
+ 64
34
39,1
39,1
100,0
Total
87
100,0
100,0
Gender:
Gender
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
male
36
41,4
41,4
41,4
female
51
58,6
58,6
100,0
Total
87
100,0
100,0
Education
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Primary school (1-4 grades)
26
29,9
29,9
29,9
Secondary school (8 grades)
28
32,2
32,2
62,1
Professional school
17
19,5
19,5
81,6
High School
14
16,1
16,1
97,7
University
1
1,1
1,1
98,9
Not responding
1
1,1
1,1
100,0
Total
87
100,0
100,0
Marriage status (single, married, divorced, etc.)
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Not married
9
10,3
10,3
10,3
married
53
60,9
60,9
71,3
Widow/widower
23
26,4
26,4
97,7
divorced
1
1,1
1,1
98,9
No responding
1
1,1
1,1
100,0
Total
87
100,0
100,0
Family/household size
Info not available
Family/household status
Info not available
Occupation
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Retired
34
39,1
39,1
unemployed
24
27.6
27.6
Farmer
8
9,2
9,2
Student
3
3,4
3,4
worker
2
2,3
2,3
Salesman
2
2,3
2,3
builder
2
2.3
2.3
Medical assistant
1
1,1
1,1
Mecanic
1
1,1
1,1
Social worker
1
1,1
1,1
driver
1
1,1
1,1
Not responding
8
9,2
9,2
Total
87
100,0
100,0
Employment status (employed/unemployed)
Info not available
Income
Info not available
Ethnic group
Info not available
Religion
Info not available
Other observations:
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Date:
Dokumentumok
Közösségfejlesztés