Közösségfejlesztés

Dokumentumok

Cím:	Hungarian Evaluation, Background List
Nyelv:	angol
Tárgyszavak:	Network, Social Capital, Central and Eastern Europe, Community Development, Background List
Állomány:	Community Development Network Building in Central and Eastern Europe, Közösségfejlesztési hálózatépítés Kelet-Közép Európában
Forditas:
Megjegyzés:
Raktári jelzet:	E

Measuring Social Capital
Background Variables
Hungary

for an exploratory analysis of
community level social capital data
from Central and East European Countries

Project on Community Development Partnership Building
in Central and Eastern Europe

Background variables 1.
Where was the survey done?
Names of community, region, country: Szegvár in the Small Region of Szentes, Csongrád County, Hungary
Community characteristics
§ Population size – number of inhabitants: 5027
§ Population profile
o Gender: male: 2420 48,1% Female: 2607 51,9%
o Age-structure
§ under 14 784 15,6%
§ 15-17 185 3,7%
§ 18-54 2671 50,7%
§ 55-59 313 6,2%
§ Over 60 1074 21,4%
o Ethnic composition Bulgarian 1 0,2 %
Greek 8 1,6 %
Polish 2 0,4 %
German 3 0,6 %
Romanian 3 0,6 %
Slovene 1 0,2 %
Hungarian 5009 99,6 %
if % not available, predominant ethnic groups (in order of predominance): …………………………………………….
o Religious composition ………
· Rome-Catholic 3483 69,3 %
· Greek-Catholic 14 2,8 %
· Reformer 286 5,7 %
· Evangelical 19 3,8 %
· Baptist 6 1,2 %
· Adventist 10 2 %
· Other Reformer 2 0,4 %
· Other Christian 3 0,6 %
· Israelite 1 0,2 %
· Not belonging to
any Churches 537 10,7 %
Refused responder 529 10,5 %
No answer 12 2,4 %
if % not available, predominant ethnic groups (in order of predominance): …………………………………………….
§ Rural/urban community profile
· (predominantly) rural
· (predominantly) urban
· can’t decide
§ Economic profile
· Occupational structure
o Agrarian 460 9,2%
o Other primary sector (e.g. mining) ……. %
o Secondary (industrial) sector 467 9,3%
o Tertiary (service) sector 714 14,2%
· Unemployment rate: 12%
· Commuters rate: …………………………….. %
(% of those who are having their jobs in an other community, in of total work force)
§ Public security
please rate the public security in the community
on a 5 point scale
(1 “very bad” … 5 “very good”, as compared to national average, by your personal opinion)
1 2 3 4 5
§ Could you cite any data on deviant behavior?
(alcoholism, drog-abuse, suicide, crime, etc.)
no……………………………………………………………………

When was the survey done?
Starting date: day: 27 month : October year: 2003 Closing date: day: 1 month : December year: 2003

Type of research
Participative research
(part of community development)
Non-participative research
(implemented for external purposes without significant participation)

Coverage of sampling
Covering all the community (total coverage)
Covering part of the community: 13,25 %
Unit of sampling
Individual
Household or family
Other

Methods of sampling (if coverage is not total)
Simple random sample
Stratified random sample
Other method: ………………………………………………………………...

Representative sample?
Representative
Not representative
Not discernable

Size and composition of sample
Number of all those selected into the sample: 4132
Number of those contacted: 2000
Number of non-respondents: 1334
(who declined responding to the questionnaire as a whole)
Number of processable questionnaires: 666
(questionnaires with any number of valid response)

How were the questionnaires administered?
§ self-administered
o in presence of interviewer
o in absence of interviewer
§ with prior explanation on administering
§ without prior explanation on administering
§ (questionnaires were just delivered to respondents
§ and collected after self-administration)
§ administered by interviewer
· interviewer from local community
· interviewer from outside

by other method: …………………………………………….….

Frame of reference of calculating response distributions

“100%” distributions of calculated data on particular questions
as a rule INclude “no answer/no data”

“100%” distributions of calculated data
as a rule EXclude “no answer/no data”
(“100%” as a rule was calculated including only “valid responses”)

Respondent’s background data
Please check which of the following were surveyed:
Age
Respondent: 645
14-17 37 6 %
18-24 63 10 %
25-39 137 21 %
40-59 214 33 %
60-69 102 16 %
70-79 66 10 %
Over 80 26 4 %
Gender
Respondent: 610
Female 376 62 %
Male 234 38 %
Education
Respondent: 636
Less than 8 elementary classes 46 7 %
8 elementary classes 147 23 %
skilled worker 154 24 %
secondary qualification 209 33 %
college degree 59 9 %
university degree 21 3 %
Marriage status (single, married, divorced, etc.)
Family/household size
Family/household status
Occupation
Unemployed 29 4 %
Works at home 2 0,3 %
Retired off 79 12 %
Early retirement 15 2 %
Pensioner 195 30 %
Other 42 6 %
Student 72 11 %
Employee 181 27 %
Entrepreneur 41 6 %
Other 10 1,7 %
Employment status (employed/unemployed)
Income
Ethnic group
Religion
Other observations:
……………………………………………………………………………………………
Date: 20 October 2004

Background variables 2.

Where was the survey done?
Names of community, region, country: the village of Királd, North-East Hungary, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County
Community characteristics
§ Population size – number of inhabitants: 934
§ Population profile
o Gender: Male: 450 48,2 % Female: 484 51,8 %
o Age-structure
· under 14 143 15,3%
· 15-25 120 12,8%
· 26-40 176 18,8%
· 41-60 267 28,6%
· 61 and over 209 22,4%
o Ethnic composition ……………… %
……………… %
……………… %
if % not available, predominant ethnic groups (in order of predominance): Hungarian
o Religious composition
· Rome-Catholic 414 44,3 %
· Greek-Catholic 19 2 %
· Reformer 130 14%
· Evangelical 12 1,3%
if % not available, predominant ethnic groups (in order of predominance): ……………………….………………….
§ Rural/urban community profile
· (predominantly) rural
· (predominantly) urban
· can’t decide (declining mining area – formerly rural - where the mines were closed in 2000)
§ Economic profile
· Occupational structure
o Agrarian 2 0,2%
o Other primary sector (e.g. mining)..%
o Secondary (industrial) sector 108 11,6%
o Tertiary (service) sector 113 12,1%
Non of these: 50 % of the active population is retired off and early retired. Declining mining community.
· Unemployment rate: 10 %
· Commuters rate: 4 %
(% of those who are having their jobs in an other community, in of total work force)
§ Public security
please rate the public security in the community
on a 5 point scale
(1 “very bad” … 5 “very good”, as compared to national average, by your personal opinion)
1 2 3 4 5
§ Could you cite any data on deviant behavior?
(alcoholism, drog-abuse, suicide, crime, etc.)
20-30 % of the population
When was the survey done?
Starting date: day: 18 month : June year: 2003 Closing date: day: 1 month: August year: 2003
Type of research
Participative research
(part of community development)
Non-participative research
(implemented for external purposes without significant participation)
Coverage of sampling
Covering all the community (total coverage)
Covering part of the community: 15 %
Unit of sampling
Individual
Household or family
Other
Methods of sampling (if coverage is not total)
Simple random sample
Stratified random sample
Other method: ………………………………………………………………...
Representative sample?
Representative
Not representative
Not discernable
Size and composition of sample
Number of all those selected into the sample: 330
Number of those contacted: 330…………………………………………
Number of non-respondents: 190………………………………………..
(who declined responding to the questionnaire as a whole)
Number of processable questionnaires: 140
(questionnaires with any number of valid response)
How were the questionnaires administered?
§ self-administered
· in presence of interviewer
· in absence of interviewer
o with prior explanation on administering
o without prior explanation on administering
(questionnaires were just delivered to respondents
and collected after self-administration)
§ administered by interviewer
· interviewer from local community
· interviewer from outside
§ by other method: …………………………………………….….
Frame of reference of calculating response distributions
“100%” distributions of calculated data on particular questions
as a rule INclude “no answer/no data”

“100%” distributions of calculated data
as a rule EXclude “no answer/no data”
(“100%” as a rule was calculated including only “valid responses”)
Respondent’s background data
Please check which of the following were surveyed:
Age
Respondent: 138
14-17 7
18-24 14
25-39 32
40-59 50
60-69 20
70-79 12
Over 80 2
Gender
Female 78 Male 60
Education
Respondent: 140
Less than 8 elementary classes 4
Elementary school 41
skilled worker 49
secondary qualification 35
college degree 9
university 2

Marriage status (single, married, divorced, etc.)
Family/household size
Family/household status
Occupation

Employment status (employed/unemployed)
Respondent: 140
Student 13 9,2%
Employee 43 30,7%
Agrarian 1
Industrial 24
Tertiary 18
Entrepreneur 5 3,6%
Industrial 4
Tertiary 1
Unemployed 16 11,4%
Disabled 4 2,9%
Pensioned off 14 10%
Early retired 3 2,1%
Pensioner 42 30%
Income
Ethnic group
Religion

Other observations:
……………………………………………………………………………………………

Date: 20 October 2004

Dokumentumok

Közösségfejlesztés